Since there is too much to do and not enough to start with in regards to the Lake James service learning projects, it is imperative that we, as researchers, ask several questions about both the project as a whole and our individual projects. First, one of our main concerns is: What is the context of this book? Sure, Lake James is the focus. However, we know little more than the eight or so areas of interest being researched for the book. In class we discussed ways to tie our research topics together, but the idea of uniting the "chapters" with a fictitious family makes me cringe. I suddenly envision a project resembling the awful ACPL genealogy tutorials. No, no, that will not do. At least in my mind.
So, what are other ways to make the "chapters" more fluid? One possible organization is chronologically, but I doubt Flaim and Jim want something that reads like a historical text. Another way to organize the book would be to start with Paultytown and move clockwise around the lake. A problem with this organization may be gaps in development, but I think this is the best organization for a coffee table book.
One crucial thing to consider when organizing this book is audience. The fictional character scenario might be mildly entertaining, but it appeals to a younger audience, an audience that may not even be interested in coffee table books. Conversely, a clockwise organization that is semi-chronological appeals to an adult audience, an audience that Flaim and Jim seem to want to target. Afterall, one of their largest aims is to preserve the older cottage-style ways of living on Lake James, as opposed to the newer McMansion-style living.
In sum, service learning for this project must entail extracting Flaim and Jim's envisioning of this book and giving back as much targeted research as possible. What we really need from them is a storyboard. Without it, we can only offer heaping folders of potentially tangential research.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You wrote: “the idea of uniting the "chapters" with a fictitious family makes me cringe.”
ReplyDeleteI actually agree with this. Many in the class, including Flaim and Jim seem to be pretty excited about it… but I’m just not seeing it yet. If we want this to be historically factual and as close to “the real” as we can manage, while eliciting the emotional response from older readers, I think that any fiction, including a fictional character, is a risky move.
I think your Paltytown idea has merit. The gaps in the lake’s history may well be filled in as we create the “spokes of this wheel.”
You wrote: “service learning for this project must entail extracting Flaim and Jim's envisioning of this book and giving back as much targeted research as possible. What we really need from them is a storyboard. Without it, we can only offer heaping folders of potentially tangential research.”
THIS.IS.AN.AWESOME.IDEA. Seriously, I think we found your first project for your independent study!!! What do you think?!?!